One in Messiah Congregation

  קָּהָל אֶחָד בְּמָּשִׁיחַ

 

27 S. Maple Street, Hohenwald, Tn. 38462

 Phone – 615 712-3931

 Or 615 591-9820

 

 http://OneinMessiah.net

 

  Email: ministermalachi@comcast.net

 

 A part of the Congregation of Israel

    עֲדַת יִשְׂרָאֵל

 

Shabbat Shalom

 

 שַׁבָּת שָׁלוֹם

 

 

Today we use the Gregorian calendar from Pope Gregory; from the 1500’s.

 

June 13, 2020 - in the 21 Century

 

 Yehovah God has His own calendar, which is deleted from the world 

 

We are now in the 3rd month of God called Sivan

 

Esth.8 [9] Then were the king's scribes called at that time in the third month, that is, the month Sivan, סִיוָן , day 20

 

For your convenience, all my studies may be viewed at these websites below:

Read, Hear, Watch or Download – Please Do them! 

 

You can read them on my site at: http://oneinmessiah.net/subjects.htm 

 

You can hear them on my site at http://oneinmessiah.net/av.htm 

 

You can watch them on my site at http://oneinmessiah.net/videoFiles.htm 

 

You can download mp3s at http://oneinmessiah.net/mp3s.htm for your mp3 players, iphone or ipad etc…

 

 

 

Today’s Topic:

 

The oppositions of science, falsely so called

 

Opposition - a conflict of theories, the false teachers boast of their science and knowledge

 

1 Timothy 6: [20] O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:[21] Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.

 

This week I wanted to watch a few astronomy shows about the universe, the planets, the earth, the moon. Talk about an oppositions of science…

 

Anyone that watches these shows gets a large dose of false science.

 

Most students are taught these things in our schools.

 

I did a study like this 11 years ago which can be uses in 2020

 

 

Said to say, some educators have taken the compromised position, harmonizing untruths with truths, in fear of losing their jobs.

 

 

NON-SCIENCE IN SCHOOL TEXTBOOKS

 

There are actual Laws and Codes to protect against inaccurate material in textbooks.

 

The problem is that these laws are not enforced, and there are many textbooks that have out-dated information in them.

 

Some evolution “proofs” that were proven false, or hoaxes, are still in the textbooks.

Other “so called facts” are not fact at all, just plain out lies.

 

Here are a few Laws that should protect the school system from getting books that have inaccuracies and lies in them:

 

Wisconsin Administrative Code 361 Role: The criteria for selection of textbooks shall be: Factual accuracy.

 

Alabama Code 1975, Section 16-36-70 “Adequate textbooks” – provides: “(b) All students in the public schools shall be provided with adequate and current textbooks…”

 

Some textbooks that contain statements and examples that are proven to be false and fraudulent are neither adequate nor current.

 

Texas Administrative Code Title 19-Education 66.66 - Instructional materials shall present the most factual information accurately and objectively without editorial opinion or bias by the authors.

 

Theories shall be clearly distinguished from facts and presented in an objective manner.

 

Florida Statute 223.09 (e) All instructional materials recommended by each counsel for use in the schools shall be to the satisfaction of each counsel, accurate, objective and current.

 

California Education Code 60200 (c3) “California Textbooks shall be factually accurate and incorporate principles of instruction reflective of current and confirmed research.”

 

8700.7500 Code of Ethics for Minnesota Teachers, Subpart 2, Standards of Professional Conduct. G. “A teacher shall not deliberately suppress or distort subject matter.”

 

The website Text Book Reviews  http://www.textbookreviews.org/ has reviews and rankings of school textbooks based on how much inaccurate information they have.

 

 

Here are some inaccuracies and lies that are in many of the science books that children at all grade levels are being taught, and are on most science shows and YouTube.

 

The Earth is 4.5 billion years old. There is no factual evidence of this, and a lot against it

 

THE AGE OF THE UNIVERSE

 

How old is the earth?  Here is what scientists have told us through the years:

 

In 1770 George Buffon said the earth was 70,000 years old. (Integrated Principles of Zoology 1996, p. 151).

 

In 1905 the age of the earth was officially 2 billion years old (Newsweek July 20, 1998 p. 50).

 

In 1969, the year we went to the moon, the official age of the earth and moon was 3.5 billion years. (The Minneapolis Tribune Monday, August 25, 1969).

 

Today, students are taught that the earth is 4.6 billion years old.

 

They say that the universe is older; about 16 billion years, give or take a few billion.

 

The age of the universe is getting older by billions each year, ha…

 

They say, the Universe began about 16.5 billion years ago, again, no proof.

 

Make up any number

 

Don’t watch astronomy shows and believe it, without looking things up

 

 

Take the population growth statistics.

 

Some people think there are just too many people on the earth, we need less.

 

The world is not overcrowded.

 

The entire world population would fit in Jacksonville Florida twice.

 

There is 25 billion square feet in Jacksonville, more than the total population of earth.

 

They say: Life evolved over a long period of time. There is absolutely no evidence that life has evolved, which is to say that one kind of animal became another kind (like a dog becoming a non-dog). 

 

 

This is a big problem – the geologic column

 

They say:

“Over millions of years, the Colorado River has carved out the Grand Canyon from solid rock.”

 

The Grand Canyon is a breech in a giant dam, called the Kaibab uplift. The top of the canyon is about 6,900 feet above sea level. The river that supposedly made it over millions of years enters the canyon at 2800 feet. This is 4,000 feet lower than the top of the canyon. So the Colorado River could not possibly have created the Grand Canyon.

 

There is such a thing as the “geologic column”. All evolution thinking is based on the geologic column. This is where the problem started in 1830. If the layers of the earth are really different ages, then why are there no erosion marks between the layers? (Merrill Earth Science 1993 p. 149).

 

It should have rained many times in 10 million years, and caused erosion.

 

A better explanation of the layers would be that they formed rapidly during and after the world wire flood of Noah.

 

An example of this would be to take a pile of dirt and put it in a glass. Shake it up and set it down. After a while you will find that the dirt has settled in layers. This is known as “hydrologic sorting”. 80 to 85 percent of Earth’s land surface does not have even 3 geologic periods appearing in “correct” consecutive order.

 

This is the imagination for the evolutionary-uniformitarian paradigm to maintain that there ever were geologic periods.”

 

(Dr. John Woodmorappe, geologist, “The Essential Non-Existence of the Evolutionary Uniformitarian Geologic Column” CRSQ Vol. 18, No. 1, June 1981, pp. 46-71).

 

Dating fossils by rock layers and rock layers by the fossils found in them is circular reasoning, and is not true. They don’t know how old the fossils or the rocks are. They are making up the ages.

 

There is such a thing as “index fossils”. This is part of the circular reasoning that is used along with the geologic column to date rocks and fossils. The index fossils date the rocks, and the rocks date the index fossils. Circular reasoning, which is false.

 

Many “index” fossils have been found still alive today, like the Coelacanth (supposedly 325-410 million years old), and Graptolites, which are 410 million years old. Instead of realizing that maybe there is something wrong with index fossils and the geologic column, scientists will instead be amazed that these “index fossils” have survived for 400 million years.

 

 

Scripture says - 1Cor.15 [39] All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds.

 

They say: Animals and plants are related.

There is no proof of this. There are variations within a “kind”, like different dogs (Great Danes, Cocker Spaniels, Pugs, etc.), but this is variation within the species, not evolution.

 

In order to get kids to believe in evolution, they present microevolution where you have variations within a kind (like Great Danes, Retrievers, Blood hounds, etc.).

 

Then they tell you that macroevolution happens because microevolution happens: 

 

 

Scripture says: "Let us reason together" - Isa.1 [18] Come now, and let us reason together, saith Yehovah: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.

 

Isa. 5 [20Woe unto them that call: evil – good and good – evil that put darkness for light and light for darkness that put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!

 

Prov. 17 [13] who so rewards evil for goodevil shall not depart from his house.

 

 

In Academia, there is presented a one sided argument for Evolution while Intelligent Design is suppressed.

 

 

Many educators are being fired for mentioning there is an intelligent design or designer.

 

EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed, http://www.expelledthemovie.com/

 

Is a feature film (DVD Release also) in which host Ben Stein goes on a quest to expose the suppression by science's anti-theist elite, and unveil new scientific facts that may suggest evidence of intelligent design in the universe.

 

http://www.academicfreedompetition.com/

 

We should urge the adoption of policies by our nation's academic institutions to ensure teacher and student academic freedom to discuss the scientific strengths and weaknesses of Darwinian evolution.

 

Teachers should be protected from being fired, harassed, intimidated, or discriminated against for objectively presenting the scientific strengths and weaknesses of Darwinian theory.

 

Students should be protected from being harassed, intimidated, or discriminated against for expressing their views about the scientific strengths and weaknesses of Darwinian theory in an appropriate manner.”

 

There is today, in the 21 century, an enormous amount of new scientific evidence that has emerged since Darwin’s 150-year-old theory of life’s origins.

 

Darwin had no thought or concept of: DNA, Microbiology, The human genome and many other advancements and developments in science (21 century)

 

Remember:

 

1859 - Charles Darwin Theory of Evolution - Origin of Species was presented. (The 19th century)

 

Adolph Hitler 1889 –1945 - from 1937 to 1945

 

Adolph Hitler preached that the Laws of Natural Selection, supposing that Evolution is true, did all his evil works.

 

On the net, there are endless websites that you can explore pertaining to Evolution and Intelligent Design

 

Excellent site for Intelligent Design is from Stephen C. Meyer - http://www.stephencmeyer.org

 

 

Here are some of the "isms" that are taught in schools:

 

Theism, in its most inclusive usage, is the belief in at least one deity.

 

Monotheism is the belief that there is only one deity.

 

Pantheism: The belief that the physical universe is equivalent to God, and that there is no 'division'.

 

Polytheism is the belief that there is more than one deity.

 

Hard polytheism views the gods as being distinct and separate beings; an example of this would be ancient Greek Mythology

 

Soft polytheism views the gods as being subsumed into a greater whole. Most forms of Hinduism serve as examples of soft polytheism.

 

Henotheism: The belief that there may be more than one deity, but one is supreme.

 

Monolatry: The belief that there may be more than one deity, but only one should be worshiped.

 

Kathenotheism: The belief that there is more than one deity, but only one deity at a time should be worshiped. Each is supreme in turn.

 

Pandeism: The belief that God preceded the universe and created it, but is now equivalent with it.

 

Panendeism combines deism with panentheism, believing the universe is a part (but not the whole) of deity

 

Polytheisms: The belief that multiple gods existed, but do not intervene with the universe.

 

Misotheism: the belief that some god or gods are evil.

 

This is why many students are atheists today.

 

 

Watch hoaxes presented as facts like this: I just heard the moon was hollow or an alien satellite

 

 

Again, watch hoaxes presented as facts like this:

 

Fossils prove Evolution.” This is not true.

Scientists cannot prove that a given fossil had ever reproduced. Or that the offspring lived, or that they were different, which means they would have evolved into a different “kind”.

 

Darwin said, “If my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties (missing links) must assuredly have existed.” Yet we haven’t found even one. So fossils don’t prove anything about evolution.

 

 

Mutations cause Evolution. This is not true.No matter how numerous they may be, mutations do not produce any kind of evolution.” (Pierre-Paul Grasse, Evolution of Living Organisms 1977, p. 88). Mutations rearrange existing information but do not increase genetic complexity.

 

Natural Selection causes EvolutionThis is not true, natural selection has a stabilizing affect on a species; it doesn’t create another “kind” of animal.

 

Crazy science:

 

Spiral Galaxies: They are still spinning, and the inside is spinning faster than the outside. If they were billions of years old, they would have lost their spiral shape.

 

The rings of Saturn are moving away from Saturn. If they were billions of years old, it would not have rings.

 

The moon is gradually getting further away from the earth. It used to be closer.

16 billion years ago - the moon would be touching the earth.

 

 

One thing is always needed before we start looking into the specifics of what evolution actually says, you need to know that there are actually 6 “kinds” of evolution.

 

It is important to know what kind of evolution you are talking about.

 

Here they are:

 

Cosmic Evolution: The Big Bang. This part of evolution has gone through quite an evolution by itself. From an area of several light years in size, to smaller than the diameter of a proton, to nothing at all, and yet it exploded, and this is where all matter came from. Since none of this has been proven, it is just a theory.

 

Chemical Evolution: All primary elements evolved from Hydrogen. This type of evolution tries to explain where all of the 115 or so primary elements came from. It is thought (theory again) that all the elements “evolved” from hydrogen, which was created in the Big Bang. Again, there is no scientific proof of this.

Stellar and Planetary Evolution: This theory tries to explain how the planets and stars formed from the primary elements created in chemical evolution. We have never seen stars and planets form; only die. It has been speculated that if twenty stars exploded, the matter ejected might create one star. This is still not evolution, because you had to lose twenty stars to gain one.

 

Organic Evolution: The origin of life. Organic evolution tries to explain the circumstances that may have produced an environment where “simple” life forms may have developed. An interesting thing to mention here is that science has yet to find a “simple” life form. Some of the “simplest” forms that science says they found are incredibly complex engineering wonders that man cannot even begin to understand, let alone replicate.

 

Macro Evolution: One animal changes to a different kind of animal, like a dog evolving into a non-dog. This has never been seen, and there is no evidence in the fossil record as well.

 

Micro Evolution: A better name would be variations, this happens all the time, like a Chihuahua and a Great Dane. There are different breeds of dog, but they are still dogs. Although making it a kind of “evolution” is not really a correct designation, we seem to be stuck with it. It does happen and is observable; this is the only type of evolution that works.

 

Now that we have defined the various types of evolution, let’s take a step back and look at how the theory came about.

 

Let’s look at where and how step #1 of the scientific method lead to step #2, the theory of evolution.

 

This involved many people, but the three most notable are James Hutton, Charles Lyell and Charles Darwin. 

 

The three of them put together the observations and hypothesis that led to the classic definition of evolution:

 

James Hutton (1726-1796): In his day, a person believed in the biblical view of creation and that the age of the earth was about 5800 years old.

 

In his book Theory of the Earth (note “theory” in the title), Hutton said the earth is “much older than most people thought”. He was the first person to say that the earth was “millions of years old”. At this time in history there were many revolutions being fought (American - 1776, French - 1789, German - 1848, Spanish - 1823, Italian - 1848 and Polish - 1831 revolutions).

 

Everyone was rebelling against the Kings of these countries. It was the age of revolutions and Anti-Monarchy. Everyone wanted a democracy.

 

The bible said, “Honor all men. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honor the king.” 1 Peter 2:17.

 

Some people believed that the Bible was an obstacle to their political agendas and they wanted to discredit it.

 

Contradicting the Bible by saying that the earth was millions of years old was just the thing that was needed. Hutton used the principle of uniformitarianism to date the earth.

 

This principle states that Earth processes occurring today are similar to those that occurred in the past.

 

He observed that the processes that changed the rocks and land around him were very slow, and he inferred that they had been just as slow throughout Earth’s history. He hypothesized that it took much longer than a few thousand years to form the layers of rock around him and to erode mountains that once towered thousands of feet high. This book greatly influenced an English geologist named Sir Charles Lyell. Hutton’s book took away peoples belief that the earth was only about 6000 years old.

 

Charles Lyell: He was a Scottish lawyer in the 1800’s, and he really hated the Bible. Lyell wrote a book in the 1830’s called the Principles of Geology. In this book, every page contains evidence if his hatred. Page 302 says “Men of superior talent (perhaps like himself), who thought for themselves, and were not blinded by authority (perhaps like the Bible)…” He really mocked the scriptures. He said that one of his goals was to “Free the science from Moses”. (Life Letters and Journals, published by John Murray 1881). 

 

Lyell was primarily responsible for giving the world the concept of the “geologic column”. This is where the different layers of dirt have different names, index fossils, and ages. Since geologists use the age of the layer of dirt to give the age of the index fossil, and the index fossil to give the age of the dirt (circular reasoning, which is not science), the only place the geologic column exists is in the textbooks. It doesn’t exist anywhere in the world. Lyell took away peoples belief that there was a biblical flood.

 

Charles Darwin: Graduated from Bible College in 1831 and set sail on the H.M.S. Beagle to collect bugs for an Englishman. He took his Bible and Charles Lyell’s book The Principles of Geology with him. He said that Lyell’s book changed is life, and Darwin started to disbelieve the Bible. He said “Disbelief crept over me on a very slow rate, but at last complete. The rate was so slow that I felt no distress.” (Letter to Russell Wallace in 1868, published in World’s Greatest Letters).

The Big Bang “theory” tries to explain that there was an explosion that began expanding the universe. Through the years the exact size of whatever exploded has been shrinking. Here is a brief history of the evolution of the Big Bang theory’s initial mass that exploded:

 

The idea for the Big Bang began with a Belgian astronomer Georges Edward Lemaitre. He said that the mass of matter was about a few light years in diameter, or about 12 trillion miles.

 

Later in 1965 it was shrunk to 275 million miles.

 

In 1972, it shrunk again to 71 million miles

 

In 1974, 54,000 miles

 

In 1983, a trillionth the diameter of a proton

 

Now, they are saying that “nothing” exploded

 

 “The observable universe could have evolved from an infinitesimal region, its then tempting to go one step further and speculate that the entire universe evolved from literally nothing” 

(Alan Guth and P Steinhardt, Scientific American May 1984 p. 128).

 

Dust particles came together and got compressed and started spinning and finally exploded and created the universe.

 

Here are a couple of comments about the Big Bang:

If the big bang theory were true, matter would be evenly distributed throughout the universe. Instead, it is lumpy. There are clusters of stars, then great voids. (New Creation p. 8, 1999).

 

“I have little hesitation in saying that a sickly pall now hangs over the big bang theory” (Sir Fredrick Hoyle, Astronomer, Cosmologist and Mathematician, Cambridge University, The Big Bang Theory Under Attack, Science Digest Vol. 92, May 1984, p. 84).

 

So we went from some kind of matter a few light years in diameter, to literally nothing exploding.

 

 

Then we have the Gap theory

Scottish theologian, Thomas Chalmers of Edinburgh University first proposed the gap theory in 1814 in order to harmonize the creation account in Genesis with the long geologic ages being proposed by the geologists of the day.

He said this theory, "…would permit an indefinite scope to the conjectures of geology--and without any undue liberty with the first chapter of Genesis." The gap theory gained enormous popularity and acceptance because of its inclusion in the notes in the Scofield Reference Bible, which first appeared in 1917.

 

It was during this period that scientists were beginning to teach that the earth was billions of years in age.

 

As a response to the scientific community, Chalmers theorized a "gap" in time between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2.

 

Evolutionism teaches that death is part of the process that nature uses in order to continually promote each species and allow adaptation to the environment (survival of the fittest).

 

The Bible clearly teaches that death is the result of the rebellion of Satan and Adam's sin, and not something that God created during the time period that gap theorists believe exists between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2.

 

John Hagee and others teach the gap theory as fact.

 

 

In closing for now,

If you want, go to my website; hold down the ctrl key, click:

 

Intelligent Design / Evolution

Non-Science - School Text Books

LIES in textbooks and museums - August 15, 2009 - 5th month, 23th day

What happened to dinosaurs? - August 2009

Why we believe in Creation, not Evolution

Answers in Creation

Center for scientific creation 1

Center for scientific creation 2

Answering Genesis

Institute for Creation Research

Intelligent Design.org

 

Beware of oppositions of science, falsely so called, prove everything!

Shabbat Shalom

 

[Click Here to Print]