One in Messiah
Congregation
קָּהָל
אֶחָד בְּמָּשִׁיחַ
A part of the
Congregation of Israel
עֲדַת
יִשְׂרָאֵל
27 S. Maple Street,
Hohenwald, Tn. 38462
Phone – 615
712-3931 - or 615 591-9820
Email:
ministermalachi@comcast.net
Shabbat Shalom
שַׁבָּת
שָׁלוֹם
----------------
Let’s pray
--------------------------------------------
Today we use the Gregorian calendar from Pope Gregory; from the
1500’s,
September 2,
2017 - in the 21 Century
September - the seventh
month – now the 9th month
Middle English septembre
Latin September
Latin septem "seven"
+ -ber (adj. suffix)
Latin september mensis
"seventh month"
September
had 30 days, until Numa when it had 29 days, until
Julius when it became 30 days long.
-----------------
We acknowledge
God’s calendar
We are now in:
6th month called Elul, 10th day
Neh.6 [15] So the wall was finished in the twenty and fifth day of the month Elul,לֶ אֱלוּל In fifty and two days
And
Neh.7 [73] So the priests, and the Levites, and the porters, and the singers,
and some of the people, and the Nethinims, and all
Israel, dwelt in their cities; and when the seventh
month came, the children of Israel were in their cities.
-----------------------------------------------------
My ministry is a teaching ministry to bring up topics in the Bible
that have never been discussed or mentioned in your life.
They have been deleted from your knowledge. You haven’t a clue they
are missing.
I will try to undelete them for you.
For your convenience, all my studies may be viewed at these
websites below:
Read, Hear,
Watch or Download – Please Do them!
You
can read them on my site at: http://oneinmessiah.net/subjects.htm
You
can hear them on my site at http://oneinmessiah.net/av.htm
You
can watch them on my site at http://oneinmessiah.net/videoFiles.htm
You
can download mp3s at http://oneinmessiah.net/mp3s.htm for your mp3 players.
---------------------
Join
us on Paltalk in our room,
in the Christian section - One in Messiah Congregation Shabbat room
Download at http://Paltalk.com - it's free! Email me and give me your paltalk nic and I will invite you
in the room.
We
stream on real player live at 12 noon at: mms://97.89.83.34:8086
Also
I would love to come and give a talk at your
congregation, school or home on the Jewish /
Hebrew roots of your faith from the Scriptures,
not Judaism. Schedule me in.
Interested? Click here: http://oneinmessiah.net/ScheduleMe
---------------------
Today’s topic:
Part 2 – Why is the
world in the way it is today? 2017
What happened to dinosaurs?
It
was not until 1900’s that the word “dinosaur” was invented
Sir Richard Owen, 20 July 1804 – 18 December 1892, a famous British anatomist and
first superintendent of the British Museum (and a staunch anti-Darwinist), on
viewing the bones of Iguanodon and Megalosaurus,
realized these represented a unique group of reptiles that had not yet been
classified.
He coined the term “dinosaur”
from Greek words meaning “Terrible Reptile" or
"Fearfully Great Reptile"”.
-------------
Some thoughts of what may have happened to dinosaurs:
As people moved in, dinosaurs moved out.
People hunted them.
Atmosphere changed after the flood.
Many were drowned in the flood.
In many countries, there are many accounts of imprints of carvings of
dinosaurs on rocks, wall and pots and there are many books that have pictures
of these finds.
--------------
In Scripture, the word dinosaur does not appear.
However,
here are the words that do appear highlighted in blue:
Some verses:
Gen. 1 [21]
And God created great whales, and every
living creature that moveth, which the waters brought
forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and
God saw that it was good.
Job. 40 [15] Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth
grass as an ox.
[16] Lo now, his strength is in his loins,
and his force is in the navel of his belly.
[17] He moveth his tail like a cedar:
the sinews of his stones are wrapped together.
[18] His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of
iron.
[19] He is the chief of the ways of God: he that made him can make his
sword to approach unto him.
[20] Surely the mountains bring him forth food, where all the beasts of
the field play.
[21] He lieth under the shady trees, in the
covert of the reed, and fens.
[22] The shady trees cover him with their shadow; the willows of the
brook compass him about.
[23] Behold, he drinketh up a river, and hasteth not: he trusteth that he
can draw up Jordan into his mouth.
[24] He taketh it with his eyes: his nose pierceth through snares.
An elephant’s tiny tail or a
hippo’s tail that looks like a flap of skin is quite unlike a cedar tree.
Clearly, the elephant and the hippo
could not possibly be “behemoth.”
The behemoth sounds like
Brachiosaurus, one of the large dinosaurs.
-------------------
Isa.14 [29]
Rejoice not thou, whole Palestina, because the rod of
him that smote thee is broken: for out of the serpent's root shall come forth a
cockatrice, and his fruit shall be fiery flying serpent
Isa. 30 [6] The burden of
the beasts of the south: into the land of trouble and anguish, from whence come
the young and old lion, the viper and fiery flying
serpent, they will carry their riches upon the shoulders of young
asses, and their treasures upon the bunches of camels, to a people that shall
not profit them.
This could be a reference to one of the
pterodactyls, which are popularly thought of as flying dinosaurs, such as the Pteranodon, Rhamphorhynchus, or Ornithocheirus.
----------------
Job. 41 [1]
Canst thou draw out leviathan with an hook? or his tongue with a cord
which thou lettest down?
[2] Canst thou put an
hook into his nose? or bore his jaw through with a
thorn?
[3] Will he make many supplications unto thee? will
he speak soft words unto thee?
[4] Will he make a covenant with thee? wilt
thou take him for a servant for ever?
[5] Wilt thou play with him as with a bird? or
wilt thou bind him for thy maidens?
[6] Shall the companions make a banquet of him? shall
they part him among the merchants?
[7] Canst thou fill his skin with barbed iron? or
his head with fish spears?
[8] Lay thine hand upon him, remember the
battle, do no more.
[9] Behold, the hope of him is in vain: shall not one be cast down even
at the sight of him?
[10] None is so fierce that dare stir him up: who then is able to stand
before me?
[11] Who hath prevented me, that I should repay
him? whatsoever is under the whole heaven is mine.
[12] I will not conceal his parts, nor his power, nor
his comely proportion.
[13] Who can discover the face of his garment? or
who can come to him with his double bridle?
[14] Who can open the doors of his face? his
teeth are terrible round about.
[15] His scales are his pride, shut up together as with a close seal.
[16] One is so near to another, that no air can
come between them.
[17] They are joined one to another, they stick
together, that they cannot be sundered.
[18] By his neesings a light doth shine, and
his eyes are like the eyelids of the morning.
[19] Out of his mouth go burning lamps, and sparks of fire leap out.
[20] Out of his nostrils goeth smoke, as out
of a seething pot or caldron.
[21] His breath kindleth coals, and a flame goeth out of his mouth.
[22] In his neck remaineth strength, and
sorrow is turned into joy before him.
[23] The flakes of his flesh are joined together: they are firm in
themselves; they cannot be moved.
[24] His heart is as firm as a stone; yea, as hard as a piece of the
nether millstone.
[25] When he raiseth
up himself, the mighty are afraid: by reason of breakings they purify
themselves.
[26] The sword of him that layeth
at him cannot hold: the spear, the dart, nor the habergeon.
[27] He esteemeth iron as straw, and brass as
rotten wood.
[28] The arrow cannot make him flee: slingstones
are turned with him into stubble.
[29] Darts are counted as stubble: he laugheth
at the shaking of a spear.
[30] Sharp stones are under him: he spreadeth
sharp pointed things upon the mire.
[31] He maketh the deep to boil like a pot: he
maketh the sea like a pot of ointment.
[32] He maketh a path to shine after him; one
would think the deep to be hoary.
[33] Upon earth there is not his like, who is made without fear.
[34] He beholdeth all high things: he is a
king over all the children of pride.
This “dragon”
may have been something like the mighty 40 ft. (12 m) Sarcosuchus
imperator (Super Croc), or the 82 ft. (25 m) Liopleurodon.
Also the sea dragons could have included dinosaur-type animals such as the Mosasaurus.
Pss. 74 [14] Thou brakest the heads of leviathan in pieces, and gavest him
to be meat to the people inhabiting the wilderness.
Pss. 104 [26] There go the ships: there is that leviathan, whom thou hast made to play therein.
Isa. 27 [1]
In that day the LORD with his sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent, even leviathan that crooked serpent; and he shall slay
the dragon that is in the sea.
-----------------------
Deut.32 [33] Their wine
is the poison of dragons, and the cruel
venom of asps.
Neh.2 [13] And I went out by night by the gate
of the valley, even before the dragon
well, and to the dung port, and viewed the walls of Jerusalem, which were
broken down, and the gates thereof were consumed with fire.
Job.30 [29] I am a brother to dragons, and a companion to owls.
Pss.44[19]
Though thou hast sore broken us in the place of dragons,
and covered us with the shadow of death.
Pss.74 [13] Thou didst divide the sea by thy
strength: thou brakest the
heads of the dragons in the waters.
Pss.91 [13] Thou shalt
tread upon the lion and adder: the young lion and the dragon shalt thou
trample under feet.
Pss.148 [7] Praise the LORD from the earth, ye dragons, and all deeps:
Isa.13 [22] And the wild
beasts of the islands shall cry in their desolate houses, and dragons in their pleasant palaces: and her time
is near to come, and her days shall not be prolonged.
Isa.27 [1] In that day the LORD with his sore and
great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent, even
leviathan that crooked serpent; and he shall slay the dragon that is in the sea.
Isa.34 [13] And thorns
shall come up in her palaces, nettles and brambles in the fortresses thereof:
and it shall be an habitation of dragons,
and a court for owls.
Isa.35 [7] And the
parched ground shall become a pool, and the thirsty land springs of water: in
the habitation of dragons, where each
lay, shall be grass with reeds and rushes.
Isa.43 [20] The beast of
the field shall honour me, the dragons and the owls: because I give waters in
the wilderness, and rivers in the desert, to give drink to my people, my
chosen.
Isa.51
[9] Awake, awake, put on strength, O arm
of the LORD; awake, as in the ancient days, in the generations of old. Art thou
not it that hath cut Rahab, and wounded the dragon?
Jer.9 [11] And I will make Jerusalem heaps, and
a den of dragons; and I will make the
cities of Judah desolate, without an inhabitant.
Jer.10 [22] Behold, the noise of the bruit is
come, and a great commotion out of the north country,
to make the cities of Judah desolate, and a den of dragons.
Jer.14 [6] And the wild
asses did stand in the high places, they snuffed up the wind like dragons; their eyes did fail, because there was
no grass.
Jer.49[33]
And Hazor shall be a dwelling for dragons, and a desolation for ever: there shall
no man abide there, nor any son of man dwell in it.
Jer.51 [34] Nebuchadrezzar
the king of Babylon hath devoured me, he hath crushed me, he hath made me an
empty vessel, he hath swallowed me up like a dragon,
he hath filled his belly with my delicates, he hath
cast me out.
[37] And Babylon shall become heaps, a dwellingplace for dragons,
an astonishment, and an hissing, without an
inhabitant.
Ezek.29[3] Speak, and say, Thus saith the Lord Yehovah; Behold, I
am against thee, Pharaoh king of Egypt, the great dragon
that lieth in the midst of his rivers, which hath
said, My river is mine own, and I have made it for myself.
Mic.1 [8] Therefore I will wail and howl, I will go stripped and naked: I will make a wailing
like the dragons, and mourning as the
owls.
Mal.1 [3] And I hated Esau, and laid his
mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons
of the wilderness.
-----------------------
Did Dinosaur Soft Tissues Still Survive?
Maybe it is not as old as you think :-)
New Research Challenges
Notion
Science Daily (July
30, 2008) — Paleontologists in 2005 hailed
research that apparently showed that soft, pliable tissues had been
recovered from dissolved dinosaur bones, a major finding that would
substantially widen the known range of preserved biomolecules.
---------------
Science Daily (Mar. 25, 2005) — Conventional wisdom among paleontologists
states that when dinosaurs died and became fossilized, soft tissues didn’t preserve – the bones were
essentially transformed into “rocks” through a gradual replacement of all
organic material by minerals.
New research by a North Carolina State University
paleontologist, however, could literally turn that theory inside out.
Dr. Mary Schweitzer, assistant professor of
paleontology with a joint appointment at the N.C. Museum of Natural Sciences, has
succeeded in isolating soft tissue from the femur of a 68-million-year-old
dinosaur.
Not only is the tissue largely intact, it’s still
transparent and pliable, and microscopic interior structures resembling blood
vessels and even cells are still present.
In a paper published in the March 25 edition of
the journal Science, Schweitzer describes the process by which she and her
technician, Jennifer Wittmeyer, isolated soft organic
tissue from the leg bone of a 68-million-year-old Tyrannosaurus rex.
Schweitzer was interested in studying the
microstructure and organic components of a dinosaur’s bone. All bone is made up
of a combination of protein (and other organic molecules) and minerals. In
modern bone, removing the minerals leaves supple, soft organic materials that
are much easier to work with in a lab. In contrast, fossilized bone is believed
to be completely mineralized, meaning no organics are present. Attempting to
dissolve the minerals from a piece of fossilized bone, so the theory goes,
would merely dissolve the entire fossil.
But the team was surprised by what actually happened when they removed the
minerals from the T. rex femur fragment. The removal process left behind stretchy
bone matrix material that, when examined microscopically, seemed to show blood
vessels, osteocytes, or bone building cells, and
other recognizable organic features.
Since current data indicates that living birds
are more closely related to dinosaurs than any other group, Schweitzer compared
the findings from the T. rex with structures found in
modern-day ostriches. In both samples, transparent branching blood vessels were
present, and many of the small microstructures present in the T. rex sample
displayed the same appearance as the blood and bone cells from the ostrich
sample.
Schweitzer then duplicated her findings with at
least three other well-preserved dinosaur specimens, one 80-million-year-old
hadrosaur and two 65-million-year-old tyrannosaurs.
All of these specimens preserved vessels, cell-like structures, or flexible
matrix that resembled bone collagen from modern specimens.
Current theories about fossil
preservation hold that organic molecules should not preserve beyond 100,000
years.
Schweitzer hopes that further research will
reveal exactly what the soft structures isolated from these bones are made of.
Do they consist of the original cells, and if so, do the cells still contain
genetic information? Her early studies of the material suggest that at least
some fragments of the dinosaurs’ original molecular material may still be
present.
“We may not really know as much about
how fossils are preserved as we think,” says
Schweitzer. “Our preliminary research shows that antibodies that recognize
collagen react to chemical extracts of this fossil bone. If further studies
confirm this, we may have the potential to learn more not only about the
dinosaurs themselves, but also about how and why they were preserved in the
first place.”
The research was funded by NC State, the N.C.
Museum of Natural Sciences and the National Science Foundation.
------------------------
Some backup information
leviathan לִוְיָתָן
לויתן
livyâthân - a
wreathed animal, that is, a serpent (especially the crocodile or
some other large sea monster)
leviathan, sea monster, dragon, large aquatic animal, perhaps the extinct
dinosaur, plesiosaurus, exact meaning unknown
Total KJV Occurrences: leviathan, 5
Job_41:1, Psa_74:14, Psa_104:26,
Isa_27:1 (2)
------------
תַּנִּינִם
הַתַּנִּינִם
הַגְּדֹלִים
Dragon, Dragons, great whales
תּנּים תּנּין tannı̂yn - tannı̂ym
- tan-neen', tan-neem' -
(The second form used in Eze_29:3);
intensive from the same as H8565;
a
marine or land monster, that is, sea serpent or jackal: - dragon,
sea-monster, serpent, whale.
Definition: dragon, serpent, sea
monster, dinosaur, sea or river monster, venomous snake
Total KJV Occurrences: 27
dragons, 15
Deu_32:33, Job_30:29, Psa_44:19,
Psa_74:13, Psa_148:7, Isa_13:22, Isa_34:13, Isa_35:7, Isa_43:20, Jer_9:11,
Jer_10:22, Jer_14:6, Jer_49:33, Jer_51:37, Mic_1:8
dragon, 6
Psa_91:13 (2), Isa_27:1, Isa_51:9,
Jer_51:34, Eze_29:3
serpent, 2
Exo_7:9-10 (2)
monsters, 1
Lam_4:3
serpents, 1
Exo_7:12
whale, 1
Job_7:12 (2)
whales, 1
Gen_1:21
-------------------------------
שָׂרָף
מְעוֹפֵף
Fiery flying serpent
שׂרף
śârâph - saw-rawf' - From H8313; burning, that is, (figuratively)
poisonous (serpent); specifically a saraph or
symbolical creature (from their copper color): - fiery (serpent), seraph.
Definition:
1) serpent, fiery
serpent
1a) poisonous serpent (fiery from burning effect
of poison)
2) seraph, seraphim - 2a)
majestic beings with 6 wings, human hands or voices in attendance upon God
Total KJV Occurrences: 11
fiery, 5
Num_21:6 (2), Num_21:8,
Deu_8:15, Isa_14:29,
Isa_30:6
serpent, 3
Num_21:8, Isa_14:29,
Isa_30:6
seraphims, 2
Isa_6:2, Isa_6:6
burned, 1
Isa_44:19
-----------------
עוּף ‛ûph - oof - A primitive root; to cover (with wings or obscurity);
hence (as denominative from H5775) to
fly; also (by implication of dimness) to faint (from the darkness of swooning):
- brandish, be (wax) faint, flee away, fly (away - ), set, shine forth, weary.
Other Definitions:
1) to
fly, fly about, fly away (verb)
1a) (Qal)
1a1) to fly, hover
1a2) to fly away
1b) (Hiphil)
to cause to fly, light upon
1c) (Polel)
1c1) to fly about or to
and fro
1c2) to cause to fly to
and fro, brandish
1d) (Hithpolel)
to fly away
2) (Qal)
to cover, be dark (verb)
3) gloom (noun feminine)
Total KJV Occurrences: 29
fly, 13
Gen_1:20, 2Sa_22:11, Job_20:7-8
(2), Psa_18:10, Psa_55:6, Psa_90:10, Pro_23:5, Isa_6:2,
Isa_11:14, Isa_60:8, Hos_9:11, Hab_1:8
flying, 6
Pro_26:2, Isa_14:29, Isa_30:6,
Isa_31:5, Zec_5:1-2 (2)
faint, 3
1Sa_14:28, 1Sa_14:31, 2Sa_21:15
flieth, 2
Deu_4:17, Psa_91:5
brandish, 1
Eze_32:10
flew, 1
Isa_6:6
set, 1
Pro_23:5
shine, 1
Job_11:17
weary, 1
Jdg_4:21
-------------
בְהֵמוֹת
Behemoth
Definition: perhaps an extinct
dinosaur, a Diplodocus or Brachiosaurus, exact meaning unknown
Total KJV Occurrences: 1
behemoth, 1 - Job_40:15 (2)
-----------------
From: http://ifers.123.st/t55-evolution-is-a-lie-intelligent-design-is-the-truth
The
popular modern scientific-materialist-atheist worldview propagated by NASA, the
mainstream media and the public education system is that you are here because
nothingness for no reason exploded and created everything!
Before
time, space, matter, consciousness, intelligence, and life, there was nothing.
Then the nothingness exploded,
and instead of destroying things like every other explosion
ever, this explosion created things, created
everything!
The
nothingness explosion somehow created space, time and all matter in the
universe in an instant and for no reason at all.
Then
all the creationary explosive debris flying outwards
at over 670 million miles per hour for 14 billion years culminated to create you!
And the cow jumped over the moon
----------------------
Yes,
first some of the more gaseous nothing came together forming suns and stars,
then solid pieces of the nothing came together forming planets and moons, then
the nothing-turned-hydrogen and oxygen came together forming water on the
nothing planet Earth, out of which single-celled living organisms magically
appeared, got to work dividing and multiplying into multi-celled conscious
organisms, which multiplied and divided and mutated into various forms of
sea-life which adapted and evolved and crawled onto land, replaced gills with
lungs, lost tails, grew opposable thumbs and started grasping at straws like
this ridiculous nihilistic notion of Big Bang evolution.
This anti-God materialist theory of evolution has been staunchly protected by the
infallibility of “science” for over 150 years, but in actual fact, just as
“science” has failed to find one true, valid proof that Earth is a ball
spinning around the Sun, scientists have failed to discover a single piece of
evidence that the material world is a product of blind chance evolution.
Furthermore, Big Bang evolution actually requires and pre-supposes many other
claims which have already been proven false in previous chapters, such as the
Plurality of Worlds, Newton’s theory of Gravity, Einstein’s theory of
Relativity, Stars being distant Suns, and Earth being a Planet, not a Plane.
Evolutionary theory claims that life started with a cell that formed by chance.
According
to this scenario, four billion years ago
various lifeless chemical compounds underwent a reaction in the primordial
atmosphere on the earth in which the effects of thunderbolts and atmospheric
pressure led to the formation of the first living cell.
The
first thing that must be said is that the claim that inanimate materials can
come together to form life is an unscientific one that has not been verified by
any experiment or observation.
Life
is only generated from life.
Each
living cell is formed by the replication of another cell.
No
one in the world has ever succeeded in forming a living cell by bringing
inanimate materials together, not even in the most advanced laboratories.
The
theory of evolution faces no greater crisis than on the point of explaining the
emergence of life.
The
reason is that organic molecules are so complex that their formation cannot
possibly be explained as being coincidental
and it is manifestly impossible for an organic cell
to have been formed by chance.” -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (128-130)
How could all the inter-connected and compartmentalized components, the cell wall, the
cell membrane, the mitochondria, proteins, DNA, RNA, ribosomes,
lysosomes, cytoplasm, vacuoles, nucleus and other
cell parts magically come together and create
conscious intelligent life from unconscious dead matter?
Just
making one average-sized protein molecule is already composed of 288 amino
acids of 12 varying types which can be combined 10300 power different ways!
Of
all those possibilities, only one forms the desired protein molecule and there
are over 600 types of proteins combined in the smallest bacterias
ever discovered.
------------------------
Astronomer Fred Hoyle compared the odds
that all the multi-faceted and multi-functional parts of a cell could
coincidentally come together and create life analogous to “a tornado sweeping
through a junk-yard and assembling a Boeing 747 from the materials therein!”
Hoyle wrote that, “If there were a basic principle of matter which somehow
drove organic systems toward life, its existence should easily be demonstrable
in the laboratory. One could, for instance, take a swimming bath to represent
the primordial soup. Fill it with any chemicals of a non-biological nature you
please. Pump any gases over it, or through it, you please, and shine any kind
of radiation on it that takes your fancy. Let the experiment proceed for a year
and see how many of those 2,000 enzymes (proteins produced by living cells)
have appeared in the bath.
I will give the answer, and so save the time and trouble and expense of
actually doing the experiment. You will find nothing at all,
except possibly for a tarry sludge composed of amino acids and other simple
organic chemicals.”
Even
if scientists placed all the chemical substances necessary for life in a tank,
applied to them any processes of their choice, and waited
for billions of years, not a single living cell could or would ever form
"The
likelihood of the spontaneous formation of life from inanimate matter is one to
a number with 40,000 zeros after it …
It
is big enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution.
The beginnings of life were not random; they must have been the product of purposeful
intelligence.
From
my earliest training as a scientist, I was very strongly brainwashed to believe
that science cannot be consistent with any kind of deliberate creation. That
notion has had to be painfully shed. At the moment, I can’t find any
rational argument to knock down the view which argues for conversion to God.
We used to have an open mind; now we realize that the
only logical answer to life is creation - and not accidental random shuffling.” -Astrobiologist
Chandra Wickramasinghe
-----------------------
“Scientific
proofs from such branches of science as paleontology, microbiology and anatomy
reveal evolution to be a bankrupt theory.
It has been stressed that
evolution is incompatible with scientific discoveries, reason and logic.
Those who believe in the
theory of evolution think that a few atoms and molecules thrown into a huge vat
could produce thinking, reasoning, professors, university students, scientists,
artists, antelopes, lemon trees and carnations.
Moreover, the scientists
and professors who believe in this nonsense
are educated people. That is why it is quite
justifiable to speak of the theory of evolution as ‘the most potent spell in
history.’
Never before has any
other belief or idea so taken away peoples’ powers of reason, refused to allow
them to think intelligently and logically, and hidden the truth from them as if
they had been blindfolded.” -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (178-179)
-----------------------------
Consciousness, life, the
beautiful diversity, complexity and interconnectedness of nature and the
universe simply could not be the result of some
random coincidental physical phenomenon.
If the likelihood of life
forming from inanimate matter is 1 x 1040,000 power,
then those are precisely the magnificent odds against which the universe could
be unintelligently designed!
Even the simple formation
of DNA and RNA molecules are similarly beyond the reach of chance to come
together, equivalent to 1 x 10600 power, or 10 with 600 zeros afterwards!
Such a mathematical
improbability actually so closely borders the impossible that the word
“improbable” becomes misleading. Mathematicians who regularly work with these
infinitesimally small numbers say anything beyond 1 x 1050 powers should be
considered, for all intents and purposes, impossible.
------------------
Dr. Leslie Orgel, an associate of Francis Crick, the discoverer of DNA wrote, “It
is extremely improbable that proteins and nucleic acids, both of which are
structurally complex, arose spontaneously in the same place at the same time.
Yet it also seems impossible to have one without the other. And so, at first
glance, one might have to conclude that life could never, in fact, have
originated by chemical means.” Or as Turkish Evolutionist Professor Ali Demirsoy stated “the probability of the coincidental
formation of cythochrome-C, just one of the essential
proteins for life, is as unlikely as the possibility of a monkey writing the
history of humanity on a typewriter without making any mistakes … Some metaphysical powers beyond our definition must have
acted in its formation.”
“Let
us suppose that millions of years ago a cell was formed which had acquired
everything necessary for life, and that it duly ‘came to life.’ The theory of evolution again collapses at this point.
For even if this cell had existed for a while, it would
eventually have died and after its death, nothing would have remained, and
everything would have reverted to where it had started.
This is because this first living cell, lacking any
genetic information, would not have been able to reproduce and start a
new generation.
Life
would have ended with its death.
The
genetic system does not only consist of DNA.
The
following things must also exist in the same environment: enzymes to read the
code on the DNA, messenger RNA to be produced after reading these codes, a
ribosome to which messenger RNA will attach according to this code, transfer
RNA to transfer the amino acids to the ribosome for use in production, and
extremely complex enzymes to carry out numerous intermediary processes.
Such an environment cannot exist anywhere apart from a totally isolated and completely
controlled environment such as the cell, where all the essential raw materials
and energy resources exist.” -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit”
(170)
---------------------------
The Big Bang theory is easily proven false as the nature of explosions is
to destroy, to break things down into their constituent parts, increasing chaos
and decreasing order; explosions simply do not and cannot create things,
causing disparate parts to combine into more ordered wholes as the Big Bang
theory contends. Similarly, the theory of evolution is proven false by entropy,
the second law of thermodynamics.
It
is a fact that systems left to their own devices tend to become corrupted,
disordered and dispersed over time.
All
things, living or not, wear out, deteriorate and decay. Entropy
They
do NOT spontaneously come together over time, in incredibly implausible
combinations creating diverse, complex and beautiful living forms! Thus the
theory of evolution is in direct opposition to the law of entropy; Evolution
supposes things become more ordered, more structured and more complex over
time, but from rust to mould to rotting corpses, nature is everywhere at odds
with such a notion.
Furthermore,
according to the Le Chatelier
Principle in chemistry, life could not have been formed in the sea
as evolutionists allege anyway; since the peptide bond created by amino acid
chains produces water molecules, it is not possible for
such a reaction to take place in a hydrous environment.
“Organic
matter can self-reproduce only if it exists as a fully developed cell with all
its organelles and in an appropriate environment where it can survive, exchange
materials, and get energy from its surroundings.
This
means that the first cell on earth was formed ‘ all of a sudden’ together with
its amazingly complex structure … What would you think if you went out hiking
in the depths of a thick forest and ran across a brand-new car among the trees?
Would you imagine that various elements in the forest had come together by
chance over millions of years and produced such a vehicle? All the parts in the
car are made of products such as iron, copper, and rubber - the raw ingredients
for which are all found on the earth - but would this fact lead you to think
that these materials had synthesized
‘by chance’ and then come together and manufactured such a car? There is no
doubt that anyone with a sound mind would realize that the car was the product
of an intelligent design - in other words, a factory - and wonder what it was
doing there in the middle of the forest. The sudden emergence of a complex
structure in a complete form, quite out of the blue, shows that this is the
work of an intelligent agent. An extraordinarily complex system like the cell
is no doubt created by a superior will and wisdom. In other words, it came into
existence as a Creation of God.” -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (170-171)
---------------------------
Many
facets of nature are far too complex, specialized, and perfect to ever have
arisen simply due to blind chance changes over time. For example, the eye with
its various parts and mechanisms all working together with the brain producing
the sharpest, clearest 3-D color images imaginable. Even the most advanced
cameras and plasma screens ever produced by humans cannot provide an image as
perfect in detail and clarity as our own eyes. Charles Darwin, the originator
of the theory of evolution himself admitted that “the thought of the eye made
him cold all over!” as he knew what an impassable obstacle the eye presented
for his theory. And it is the same with ears and audio equipment. For over a
century many thousands of researchers, scientists and engineers have been
working in factories across the world trying to produce sharper, clearer
audio/video playing and recording devices, never coming close to the
capabilities and perfection of the ear and eye.
“Look at the book you read, your hands with which you hold it, then lift your
head and look around you. Have you ever seen such a sharp and distinct image as
this one at any other place? Even the most developed television screen produced
by the greatest television producer in the world cannot provide such a sharp
image for you. This is a three-dimensional, colored, and extremely sharp image
… No one would say that a HI-FI or a camera came into being as a result of
chance. So how can it be claimed that the technologies that exist in the human
body, which are superior even to these, could have come into being as a result
of a chain of coincidences called evolution? It is evident that the eye, the
ear, and indeed all the other parts of the human body are products of a very
superior Creation.” -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit”
(175-178)
Charles Darwin, in his “Origin of Species,” the veritable Bible of
atheist-materialists, stated that, “If my theory be true, numberless
intermediate varieties, linking most closely all of the species of the same
group together must assuredly have existed …
Consequently
evidence of their former existence could be found only amongst fossil remains.”
Darwin himself knew no such “transitional forms” had been discovered and hoped
that they would be found in the future. He even admitted in his “Difficulties
on Theory” chapter that these missing intermediate forms were the biggest
stumbling-block for his theory. He called it “the most obvious and gravest
objection which can be urged against my theory.”
“According to the theory of evolution, every living
species has emerged from a predecessor.
One species which existed previously turned into something else over time
and all species have come into being in this way.
According
to the theory, this transformation proceeds
gradually over millions of years.
If
this were the case, then innumerable intermediate species should have lived
during the immense period of time when these transformations were supposedly
occurring.
For
instance, there should have lived in the past some half-fish/half-reptile
creatures which had acquired some reptilian traits in addition to the fish
traits they already had. Or there should have existed some reptile/bird
creatures, which had acquired some avian traits in addition to the reptilian
traits, they already possessed. Evolutionists refer to these imaginary
creatures, which they believe to have lived in the past as, ‘transitional
forms.’ If such animals had really existed, there would have been millions,
even billions, of them. More importantly, the remains of these creatures should
be present in the fossil record. The number of these transitional forms should
have been even greater than that of present animal species and their remains
should be found all over the world.” -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (61)
----------------------
Darwin
hoped that transitional forms of animal species gradually evolving into
different species would eventually be discovered at some future time in the
fossil record. To this day, however, no such transitional forms have ever been
found anywhere in the world. Darwin’s observations regarding natural selection
and adaptation were certainly correct. So-called “micro-evolution” of various
traits and characteristics within a species has been confirmed and widely
exists, but “macro-evolution,” the supposed transformation from one species
into a completely different species has never been observed, and no evidence of
such evolution exists anywhere in the fossil record. Colin Patterson, senior
paleontologist for the British Museum of Natural History and an ardent
evolutionist, even he admits that Darwinists must concede natural selection has
never been observed to actually cause anything to evolve: “No one has ever
produced a species by mechanisms of natural selection. No one has ever got near
it and most of the current argument in neo-Darwinism is about this question.”
“Even
in the most ‘scientific’ books about evolution, the stage of ‘transition from
water to land’ - one of the unexplainable points of evolution - is given in
such simplicity that they do not prove to be believable even for children.
According to evolution, life began in water and the first developed animals on
earth were fish. According to the story, one day fish species developed the
ability to climb out of water and moved on land! The theory continues that fish
which chose to live on land had feet instead of fins and lungs instead of
gills! In most of the books about evolution, nobody explains ‘why’ the
transition occurred. Even in the most ‘scientific’ sources, writers suddenly
jump to conclusions like ‘and transition from water to land occurred’ without
providing a satisfactory answer regarding how the process worked. Yet how did
this transformation occur? It is obvious that a fish cannot survive out of
water for more than one or two minutes. If, we assume that a drought really
existed as claimed by evolutionists, and fish were, for some reason, drawn to
lands then what would happen to fish even if this process lasts for ten
millions of years? The answer is straight: Fish leaving the water would
inevitably die in a few moments. Even if this process lasted for ten millions
of years, the answer would still be the same; All fish
would die one by one. Nobody would dare to say: ‘Maybe after 4 million years
some of the fish suddenly acquired lungs while they were trying to survive.
This would no doubt be an illogical assertion! However that is exactly what
evolutionists claim.” -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit”
(212)
-----------------------------
**One of the first frauds in the history of Darwinism, known as “recapitulation
theory,” and heralded as undeniable “proof of evolution,” was an idea proposed
and propagated by a racist eugenicist Professor named
Ernst Haeckel in the late 19th century.
A
contemporary and friend of Charles Darwin and Thomas “Bulldog” Huxley, Haeckel
postulated that human (and other animal) embryos experience a miniature form of
the entire evolutionary impulse during their development in the womb,
displaying first characteristics of fish, then reptile, and lastly mammalian or
human.
It
has long been eliminated from scientific literature, but many people and
popular sources still unknowingly quote and believe in
Haeckel’s fraudulent work.
Several popular magazines and school textbooks as recently as the 1990s,
over a century after being exposed, were still publishing Haeckel’s hoaxed
pictures and recapitulation theory as science fact!
It has since been proven that this theory is completely bogus.
It
is now known that the ‘gills’ that supposedly appear in the early stages of the
human embryo are in fact the initial phases of the middle-ear canal,
parathyroid, and thymus. The part of the embryo that was likened to the ‘egg
yolk pouch’ turns out to be a pouch that produces blood for the infant. The
part that had been identified as a ‘tail’ by Haeckel and his followers is in
fact the backbone, which resembles a tail only because it takes shape before
the legs do.
Another
interesting aspect of ‘recapitulation’ was Ernst Haeckel himself, a faker who falsified his drawings in order to support the
theory he advanced.
Haeckel’s forgeries purported to show that fish and human embryos resembled
one another.
When
he was caught out, the only defense he offered was that other evolutionists had
committed similar offences!” -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (199-200)
Haeckel was charged with fraud by five professors and convicted by a
university court at Jena where he admitted that several of his drawings were
forgeries, that he was merely filling in missing links where evidence was thin,
and that hundreds of his contemporaries were guilty of the same charge!
During the trial he said; “After this compromising
confession of forgery I should be obliged to consider myself
condemned and annihilated if I had not the consolation of seeing side by side
with me in the prisoners’ dock hundreds of fellow culprits, among them many of
the most trusted observers and most esteemed biologists. The great majority of
all the diagrams in the best biological textbooks, treatises and journals would
incur in the same degree the charge of forgery, for all of them are inexact,
and are more or less doctored, schematized and constructed.”
What an admission! Not only did Haeckel confess his own forgeries, but he
admitted that there were hundreds of other scientific fraudsters similarly doctoring
findings in the best biological textbooks, treatises and journals (several of
which will be examined in this chapter).
As
it turns out, Haeckel had simply copied and printed the same human embryo
pictures several times over claiming each were various other animal embryos
with exact parallels, when in fact the parallels do not exist, and the pictures
were copies he knowingly and intentionally made to suit his recapitulation
idea.
“To support his theory, Haeckel, whose knowledge of embryology was self-taught,
faked some of his evidence.
He not only altered his illustrations of embryos but also printed the same
plate of an embryo three times, and labeled one a human, the second a dog and
the third a rabbit ‘to show their similarity.’” - Malcolm
Bowden, “Ape-Men: Fact or Fallacy?”
------------------------------
“This is one of the worst cases of scientific fraud. It’s shocking to find that
somebody one thought was a great scientist was deliberately misleading. It
makes me angry … What Haeckel did was to take a human embryo and copy it,
pretending that the salamander and the pig and all the others looked the same
at the same stage of development. They don’t … These are fakes.” -Dr. Michael Richardson, The
Times London, Aug. 11, 1997
----------------------------------
From the net, altered
Communism, responsible for the
death of 120 million people, is the
direct outcome of materialistic philosophy.
Fascism, despite pretending to
be an alternative to the materialistic world-view, accepted the fundamental
materialist concept of progress though conflict and
sparked off oppressive regimes, massacres, world wars and genocide.
Karl
Marx
made it clear that Darwin's theory provided a solid ground for communism.
He also showed to Darwin by dedicating Das Kapital,
which is considered as his greatest work, to him.
In the German
edition of the book, he wrote: "From a devoted
admirer to Charles Darwin"
Karl Marx, the
founder of communism and dialectical materialism, wrote that Darwinism was "the
basis in natural history" for his worldview.
----------------------------------------------
2017 from last week
The Antifa movement – from the Phil
Valentine website
The Antifa movement has its roots in the German Communist Party of the 1930s. It was a movement against the Nazi regime of
Adolf Hitler. The communists and the Nazis have been
fighting one another for over 100 years.
Both the Nazis and the communist
want complete domination over you.
This is why the communists were
fighting the Nazis in World War II. This is why the communists were fighting
the Nazis in Greensboro in 1979. This is why the communists were fighting the
Nazis in Charlottesville in 2017.
And they've gotten quite clever,
these communists. They no longer call themselves communists. They've reverted
to their 1932 German roots as "anti-fascists."
Again, who can be against the
folks who are against the fascists? It's brilliant, actually. So much so that they've recruited a whole new slate of useful idiots
from governors to senators to mayors. And the mainstream media are clearly in their
camp. Some completely complicit. Some
useful idiots. Some just plain idiots.
Take a look at their two symbols.
The communist Antifa
movement of 1932 Germany and the Antifa movement of
today. They are the same thing. Why? Because
they are the same people.
The Antifa people are all about redistribution of wealth,
they're anti-capitalists, they hate what America was founded
on. They're bound and determined to destroy our country from within, and now
they have people in government doing their bidding over fear of being labeled a
Nazi if they don't.
The Nazis are too stupid to
change their image. They're still out there with swastikas and Nazi salutes.
They look like a bunch of clowns.
The communists are far more
sophisticated. They have the backing of George Soros and they come in many
forms.
The Antifa people are all about redistribution of wealth,
they're anti-capitalists, they hate what America was founded
on. They're bound and determined to destroy our country from within, and now
they have people in government doing their bidding over fear of being labeled a
Nazi if they don't.
The Nazis are too stupid to
change their image. They're still out there with swastikas and Nazi salutes.
They look like a bunch of clowns.
The communists are far more
sophisticated. They have the backing of George Soros and they come in many
forms.
Antifa, Black Lives Matter, Occupy Wall Street, the
climate change movement. These are the people who scream about micro
aggressions and trigger words and safe spaces. You need to understand who these
people are so you don't fall into their trap like so many people have.
Antifa is crafty, insidious, and extremely dangerous.
Remember the snowflakes who fell apart after Trump won?
These people are basically rabid snowflakes. They roam from town to town like a
deranged mob on Soros' payroll to commit violent acts against Nazis and anybody
else who stands in their way, all the while knowing the complicit media will
cover them in a good light. I don't mind saying it again. They are far, far
more dangerous than the neo-Nazis who have no clout, no power, and no sense.
Arm yourselves with knowledge and
let's expose these people for who they really are.
---------------------------------
And on and on I
can go…
The truth is out
there for you search, due diligence is needed.
As Scripture
says:
Shabbat Shalom
שַׁבָּת שָׁלוֹם